Cases 21 - 28 of 28
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv05254
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , J. C. Penney Company, Inc. , Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv05254
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., The Dress Barn, Inc., Kirkland's Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Sigma Designs, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Kwan Chan
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Salvatore Scorza v. Tony Lyons et al
as 2:2010cv05507
Defendant:
Amazon.com International, Inc., Barns & Noble, Inc., Borders Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Scorza
Collins v. GameStop Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv01210
Plaintiff:
James Collins
Defendant:
GameStop Corp., GameStop.com, Inc., B&N GameStop Holding Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rene Carranza v. Lideres Entertainment Group et al
as 2:2009cv03604
Plaintiff:
Rene Carranza
Defendant:
Lideres Entertainment Group, Universal Music Group Inc, Universal Music Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Michael Townsend v. Herbert Moseley et al
as 2:2008cv03557
Defendant:
4th Avenue Distributing, LLC, A Book Company, LLC, A Different Light and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence Townsend
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jane Doe v. Barnes & Noble, Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01181
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc, Barnes & Noble, Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Alexander Toberoff, et al v. Barnes & Noble Inc, et al
as 2:2003cv08498
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Toberoff and Dahlia Toberoff
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
