Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Barrett v. Oregon Dep't of Corrections, et al.
as 6:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
S.J. Barrett
Defendant:
Oregon Dep't of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent:
Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv00738
Petitioner:
Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent:
Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Nathan Warren and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Nathan Warren, Jonathan Reitan, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Century Link Public Communications, Inc., CT Corp. Systems and Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01896
Defendant:
Collete Peters, Michael Hsu and Kate Brown
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Global Tel Link Corp et al
as 6:2020cv01465
Defendant:
Pinnacle Public Services, LLC doing business as Telmate and Global Tel Link Corp
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil-Barrett v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00928
Defendant:
J. Sanchez, Bev Clarno, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Liam O'Neil-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
