Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Thomas et al v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Carvin Thomas and Terrell Lawrence
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan, Gary Faulcon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shrum v. Tilley et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
James E. Shrum
Defendant:
Timothy Tilley, Officer (f/n/u) Barrett and Lt. (f/n/u) Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wortman III v. State of Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 3:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Mark Edward Davidson, f/n/u Stewart, Richard Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Auston Wortman III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2019cv00974
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Nancy Barrett, Dr. (f/n/u) LaVick and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sotherland v. Ford et al
as 1:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery, Tim Gobble, Yusuf Hakeem and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Sotherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Board of Paroles Members/Chairman et al
as 3:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Haynes
Defendant:
Board of Paroles Members/Chairman, Stacee Patterson, Director of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrone v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Frankln Delano McGrone
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Bobby Peacock, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Genovese
as 3:2017cv00062
Petitioner:
Jerome Sidney Barrett
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
