Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Stein v. Barrett Business Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05912
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services, Inc., Michael L. Elich and James D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Carnes v. Barrett Business Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05903
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Carnes
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services, Inc., Michael L. Elich and James D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arciaga et al v. Barrett Business Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05884
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Arciaga , Joseph Masseli and Vimal Mathimaran
Defendant:
Barrett Business Services, Inc. , Michael L. Elich and James D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Barrett v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01232
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Marvin Earl Barrett, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stone v. Barrett et al
as 2:2012cv02035
Plaintiff:
Gordon K Stone
Defendant:
William P. Barrett , Valley Orthopedic Building Partnership II, Proliance Surgeons, Inc., P.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett v. Amos Financial LLC, et al
as 3:2012cv05340
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barrett
Defendant:
Amos Financial LLC, Ohannes Korogluyan and Daniel Rezko
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barrett v. Creditors Financial Group, LLC
as 3:2012cv05326
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barrett
Defendant:
Creditors Financial Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barrett v. Law Office of Andrew C. Heinegg, PLLC
as 3:2012cv05325
Plaintiff:
Stephen Barrett
Defendant:
Law Office of Andrew C Heinegg PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Conner v. SimplexGrinnell, LP
as 2:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Barrett L Conner
Defendant:
SimplexGrinnell LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKee v. McKenna et al
as 3:2012cv05125
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R McKee
Defendant:
Rob McKenna, Timothy Lang, Sara Di Vittorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
