Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Jennifer Baughman v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:23-CV-07737
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Baughman
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Kenvue Inc and others
Schmidt et al v. Chris Biz Services LLC
as 2:2023cv14284
Plaintiff:
George Schmidt and Zachary Charles Baughman
Defendant:
Chris Biz Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baughman v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2023cv05483
Plaintiff:
Zachary Baughman
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baughman v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 1:2023cv05483
Plaintiff:
Zachary Baughman
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baughman v. The Business Concierge Team LLC
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Baughman
Defendant:
The Business Concierge Team LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baughman et al v. BOTTOM LINE CONCEPTS LLC
as 1:2023cv21862
Plaintiff:
Zachary Charles Baughman and George Schmidt
Defendant:
BOTTOM LINE CONCEPTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jennifer Baughman v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as CAC/2:23-CV-00477
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Baughman
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00774
Plaintiff:
Aguilar, Keli Aguilar, Gina Armendariz and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
