Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BAUGHMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07896
Plaintiff:
GARY BAUGHMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv12652
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
SANDRA FOOR and THE ESTATE OF SUE BAUGHMAN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BAUGHMAN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et als.
as 2:2019cv15014
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Baughman
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUGHMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv07164
Plaintiff:
JULIA BAUGHMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUGHMAN v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv02477
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GARY BAUGHMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUGHMAN et al v. UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2008cv02901
Plaintiff:
BECKY BAUGHMAN, STEPHEN BAUGHMAN and KIDDIE KOLLEGE DAYCARE & PRESCHOOL, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
