Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Bernal et al
as 4:2013cv01520
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Felipe Bernal and B & M Tear Off Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pinnacle Roofing Systems, Inc.
as 4:2012cv06372
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Fund , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Pinnacle Roofing Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan et al
as 3:2012cv05567
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Peter Ross CA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Blue Sun Metals, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Blue Sun Metals, Inc. and Stephen Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. North Bay Waterproofing, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02374
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/ North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
North Bay Waterproofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Petersen-Dean, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05455
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Petersen-Dean, Inc., Tri-Valley Supply, Inc. and Petersen-Dean Commercial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. RLRCO
as 3:2011cv02625
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
RLRCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board Of Trustees Of The Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Premium Roofing Waterproofing et al
as 4:2011cv01034
Plaintiff:
Board Of Trustees Of The Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Premium Roofing Waterproofing, Jesus Ambriz Cervantes and Alan Charles Kreager
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Centry Roof and Solar Inc.
as 4:2011cv00912
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , Easy Bay / North Bay Roofer Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Centry Roof and Solar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Hester Roofing
as 3:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund , Pacific Coast Roofers Pension Plan , East Bay/North Bay Roofers Vacation Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Hester Roofing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
