Cases 1 - 6 of 6
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07453
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, The Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control et al., v. Exxon Mobil Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Inc., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
California Department of Toxic Substance Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00729
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Anardarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substance Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
Bayer Cropscience Inc. et al v. Montrose Chemical Corp. of California
as 2:2014cv09178
Plaintiff:
Bayer Cropscience Inc. and Stauffer Management Company LLC
Defendant:
Montrose Chemical Corp. of California
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03378
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Anadarko E&P Company LP, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
USA, et al v. Iron Mountain Mines, et al
as 2:1991cv00768
Plaintiff:
USA and State of California
Cross_claimant:
Rhone-Poulnec Basic Chemicals Company and Rhone-Poulenc Inc
Cross_defendant:
Iron Mountain Mines , T. W. Arman and USA
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc fka Aventis CropScience USA Inc
Claimant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc fka Aventis CropScience USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
