Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BAYNE v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2012cv01929
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS BAYNE
Defendant:
JANET A. NAPOLITANO, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and BEATRICE WELTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATTS v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv01542
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE E. WATTS
Defendant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION and RUBY C. MANNING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Ron Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.
as 11-7128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ron Dixon, As Conservator for Beatrice Jiggets
Defendant - Appellee:
Midland Mortgage Co.
ALEXIS v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01626
Plaintiff:
BAYNE ALEXIS
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER and BEATRICE WELTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02216
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE HILL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GIRDLER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv01807
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE GIRDLER and RONALD GIRDLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
ANDERSON et al v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01507
Plaintiff:
LARRY F. ANDERSON, BOBBY ABRAHAM, CHARLENE ADAMS and others
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BECKLEY v. VILSACK
as 1:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
BEATRICE BECKLEY
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AMDUSO et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN et al
as 1:2008cv01361
Plaintiff:
MILLY MIKALI AMDUSO, JOYCE AUMA OMBESE ABUR, JAMES ANDAYI MUKABI and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BENNETT et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. BENNETT, JIMMIE CONYERS, KATIE CROSBY and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
