Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Eads v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Eads
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hawley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dorn v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03829
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Dorn
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Munguia v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05338
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Munguia
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cabrera v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04478
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Cabrera
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03223
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Moore and Beatrice Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louf v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021dp20009
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Beatrice D. Louf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, et al v. Larose
as 1:2020cv01908
Plaintiff:
Soli Collins, C. Ellen Connally, Sarah Rikleen and others
Defendant:
Frank LaRose
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Ohio Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01368
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Carla Pratt
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
