Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Guinac-Velasquez v. Garland
as 23-4259
Petitioner: ERICELDA BEATRICE GUINAC-VELASQUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review, et al
as 22-56036
Plaintiff / Appellant: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellee: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-55988
Plaintiff / Appellee: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commiser of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities and others
Cindy Alegre, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 22-55070
Plaintiff / Appellant: CINDY ALEGRE, FRANK ALEGRE, MICHAEL ALEGRE and others
Defendant / Appellee: SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, United States of America, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior - Indian Affairs, United States of America, in his official capacity, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior - United States of America, in his official capacity and others
Estate of Katie B. Landrum, et al v. WDW Joint Venture, et al
as 21-56366
Plaintiff / Appellee: ESTATE OF KATIE BEATRICE LANDRUM, by and through its Successors-in-Interest, MARUICE LANDRUM, Jr., an individual, KATHY JOHNSON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: WDW JOINT VENTURE, a California Entity, DBA Downey Community Health Center
Defendant: JAMES LANDRUM, an individual and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Corixa Rosales-Cisneros v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70898
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner: CORIXA BEATRICE ROSALES-CISNEROS
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56287
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM A. FERRARA, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBPs Office of Field Operations, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56417
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTORIA DOE, MARIA DOE, JOSE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, United States Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, US Department of Homeland Security
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Premier One Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-17139
Not Yet Classified: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Trustee for the Certificateholders of the MlMi Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE1 and PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS, INC.
Counter Defendant: MICHAEL A. VATTIMA and BEATRICE V. VATTIMA
Defendant: NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. and SPRING MOUNTAIN RANCH MASTER ASSOCIATION
Kim; et al. v. Queens Medical Center; et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00463
Plaintiff: Beatrice Kim and Raymond Kim
Defendant: CMS, Doe Limited Liability Companies 1-10, Queen's Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?