Cases 1 - 10 of 19
STAGGS et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv00977
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. STAGGS and GENNESS STAGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
JOHNSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON and NANCY JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRADBERRY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv00196
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRADBERRY
Defendant:
GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE UK LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WILLS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv01530
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BALLINGER-NARDEI v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv01384
Plaintiff:
CAROL BALLINGER-NARDEI
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Latta v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2009cv00357
Plaintiff:
Shelia Latta and Shelia Latta
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FINNEY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 4:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA FINNEY and VIRGINIA FINNEY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PATRICK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 3:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH PATRICK and DEBORAH PATRICK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DENNY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 4:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
JOHN DENNY and JOHN DENNY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thacker v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kennard Thacker, Sr and Kennard Thacker, Sr
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
