Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00640
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00125
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00639
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. Regional Justice Center et al
as 2:2015cv01632
Defendant:
Colleen Baharau, Judge David Barker, Judge Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gomes v. Mildebrandt et al
as 2:2015cv01578
Defendant:
Linda Marie Bell, Santino Bonaventure, Cynthia Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine J. Gomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Love v. State of Nevada
as 2:2015cv01306
Defendant:
Stewart L. Bell and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Wilson Earl Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Villela v. Ames et al
as 2:2014cv01277
Defendant:
Jack Ames, Linda Bell, Kristine Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Alfredo Villela
Interested Party:
Bryon A. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
