Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gelesky v. AK Steel Corporation Pension Agreements Plan et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Richard D Gelesky
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation Pension Agreements Plan and AK Steel Corporation Benefit Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Schumacher v. AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan et al
as 1:2009cv00794
Plaintiff:
William Schumacher
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan and AK Steel Corporation Benefit Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
West v. AK Steel Retirement, et al
as 1:2002cv00001
Plaintiff:
John D West
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan and AK Steel Benefit Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Schmidt v. AK Steel Corporation Pensions Agreement et al
as 1:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Schmidt, Donald W. Schmidt and Donald W. Schmidt
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation Pensions Agreement and AK Steel Corporation Benefit Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Senco Products, Inc. Employee Benefit Plans Administration Committee
as 1:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Senco Products, Inc. Employee Benefit Plans Administration Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lintner v. AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan et al
as 1:2009cv00231
Plaintiff:
Louis Larry Lintner
Defendant:
AK Steel Corporation Retirement Accumulation Pension Plan and AK Steel Corporation Benefit Plans Administrative Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
