Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
Susan Diane Wojcicki, William Henry Gates, Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
T. et al v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
T. T. and L. T.
Defendant:
CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company, Cigna Behavioral Health and Louis Berger, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rich v. Winder et al
as 2:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Rich
Defendant:
James M. Winder, FNU Harris, Seslie K. Sisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Berger
as 2:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Hans Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Berger v. Stevens-Henager College et al
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Lee Berger
Defendant:
Stevens-Henager College, Mario Merida and Vickie Dewsnup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rose v. Utah State Bar et al
as 2:2010cv01001
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose
Defendant:
Utah State Bar, Barbara Townsend, Billie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Utah State et al
as 2:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose
Defendant:
Utah State, Utah State Bar, Carolyn Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jones et al v. E. B. Berger
as 2:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Judd Jones, Paul S. Hofheins, John Michel and others
Defendant:
E. B. Berger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rose v. Utah State Bar et al
as 2:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose
Defendant:
Utah State Bar, Barbara Townsend, Arthur B. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
