Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wrenn et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08968
Plaintiff: Roy Wrenn and Ramel Gibson
Defendant: City of New York, Jason Arbeeny, Michael Arenella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bergman v. McNally
as 1:2023cv07112
Plaintiff: Gregory Bergman
Defendant: Keith McNally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shiftpixy, Inc. v. Access2 Financial, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05686
Plaintiff: Shiftpixy, Inc.
Defendant: Access2 Financial, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Gregory Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rigrodsky Law, P.A. v. Neonode Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05634
Plaintiff: Rigrodsky Law, P.A.
Defendant: Neonode Inc., Ulf Rosberg, Peter Lindell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shiftpixy, Inc. v. Bergman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv07135
Plaintiff: Shiftpixy, Inc.
Defendant: Gregory Bergman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00338
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Husselman v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07525
Defendant: James R. Bergman, Tunc Doluca, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff: John Husselman
Burns v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07168
Defendant: James R. Bergman, Tunc Doluca, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Burns
Khan v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03982
Defendant: James R. Bergman, Mercedes Johnson, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff: Waseem Khan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?