Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
James Rankin v. Berrien County, MI
as 21-1721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI
Owen Barnaby v. Bret Witkowski, et al
as 21-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET WITKOWSKI, County Treasurer, COUNTY OF BERRIEN, named as Berrien County Government and COUNTY OF BERRIEN, MI, named as Berrien County Government
Edward Pinkney v. Berrien Cnty, MI, et al
as 21-2802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD PINKNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI, jointly and severally liable and BERRIEN COUNTY, MI PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, in his official capacity as a local, non-state official and involving a legal existence separate and distinct from Berrien County, MI, jointly and severally liable
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Owen Barnaby v. Mabel Mayfield, et al
as 20-1564
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM B. MURPHY, C.J., The Honorable, ALFRED M. BUTZBAUGH, The Honorable, BERRIEN COUNTY TRIAL COURT, for the State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Lori Drews v. Berrien County, MI
as 20-1267
Defendant / Appellee:
BERRIEN COUNTY, MI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN DREWS
James Bogan v. Berrien County Sheriffs Dept, et al
as 20-1139
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATH WATSON, Employee of Old National Bank, BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JOSHUA SUTHERLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DEMARCO BOGAN, aka J. Bogan-Bey and JAMES DEMARCO BOGAN, named as J. Bogan-Bey Ex Rel. James DeMarco Bogan, aka J. Bogan-Bey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
