Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
MODRALL v. STARR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00881
Plaintiff: ROBERT G. MODRALL
Defendant: GREGORY B. STARR, BILL A. MILLER, PAUL D. HALLENBECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2016cv00799
Plaintiff: ERIE BAKER
Defendant: SIBLEY REYNOLDS, STATE OF ALABAMA and BILL FRANKLYN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2015cv02222
Plaintiff: MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and BILL CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MODRALL v. CORKER et al
as 1:2015cv00559
Plaintiff: ROBERT MODRALL
Defendant: BOB CORKER, BILL KILLIAN, JOE FOWLKES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff: MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA, HARRY CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2015cv00170
Plaintiff: MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant: HARRY CLINTON and BILL CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNADY v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff: VINCENT CANNADY
Defendant: STATE OF MISSOURI, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI BOARD OF CURATORS, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff: E K WADE
Defendant: JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00413
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Movant: JOHN L. SAMPSON , MARTIN MALAVE DILAN , JOSE M. SERRANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01078
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?