Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vaughn v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Shaddrick Vaughn
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kathy Holt and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Thomas et al
as 5:2011cv03426
Plaintiff:
Leon McGhee
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Billy Mitchem and David Tulley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 7:2011cv02666
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Patric and Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Watkins
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Lloyd Wallace, Derwin Halbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 5:2010cv03069
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Douglas
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Billy Mitchem, Diane Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02629
Plaintiff:
Lester Carpenter Reed
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy D. Patrick, David Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2010cv02080
Plaintiff:
Christian Ivan Green
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick, Earl Joyner and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2010cv02057
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2009cv02426
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Nicole Allen
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2009cv02360
Plaintiff:
Clifford Edward Daniels
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Edna Harris and Wierenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
