Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, LLC et al v. FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS, LLC
as 2:2014mc00266
Movant:
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, LLC and BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC.
Respondent:
FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES LLC et al v. FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS LLC
as 2:2014mc00265
Petitioner:
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES LLC and BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC.
Respondent:
FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rodriguez
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc., Michael Crum, Dallas Foard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SCOTT et al v. BIMBO BAKERIES USA
as 2:2010cv03154
Plaintiff:
QUINN F. SCOTT , RONALD SOCHACKI , WILLIAM J. DAVENPORT, III and others
Defendant:
BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. and BIMBO FOODS BAKERIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
