Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Carreon v. Biotronik, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Roberta Carreon
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc.
Interested Party:
MS Holding II SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Roberta Carreon v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Roberta Carreon
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Interested Party:
MS Holding II SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Roberta Carreon v. Biotronik, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Roberta Carreon
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc. and DOES 1 to 20
Interested Party:
MS Holding II SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Pierce v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02257
Plaintiff:
Marcie Pierce
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc. and Biotronik Vertriebs GMBH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denovo Medical, Inc. et al v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv04195
Plaintiff:
Denovo Medical, Inc. and Ronald Fry
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc., James Maldonado, Marlou Janssen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Barry Hawkins v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02227
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc., Does and Tyrone E Myles
Plaintiff:
James Barry Hawkins
James Barry Hawkins v. Biotronik, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02021
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
James Barry Hawkins
Biotronik, Inc. v. Sant
as 2:2016cv01632
Plaintiff:
Biotronik, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Sant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Biotronik, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02407
Plaintiff:
Max Bennett
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01858
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of California
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc., Denovo Medical, Inc., Fremont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
