Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Snow-Bivens v. Trans-Frt McNamara, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Snow-Bivens
Defendant:
Trans-Frt McNamara, Inc. and Muawya Solaiman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stewart v. Wiedman et al
as 2:2021cv01876
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Darci Moore, Matthew Wiedman, David Andy Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05410
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bivens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20218
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bivens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon et al v. Zabka et al
as 1:2013mc00094
Plaintiff:
Ruth Dixon , Ishea Anderson-Rodriguez , Andre Smith and others
Defendant:
Scott Zabka, S.Z. Enterprises, Inc. and Scott Fetzer Companies
Interested_party:
Richard E. Herthneck Co., L.P.A. and Richard Herthneck
Bivens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20447
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bivens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bivens v. Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
as 5:2012cv01906
Plaintiff:
Cathy J. Bivens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chuck Bivens Services, Inc. v. McWane, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Chuck Bivens Services, Inc.
Defendant:
McWane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bivens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv02821
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bivens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
