Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Norma Rubio et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04878
Plaintiff:
Norma Rubio, Christina Priscilla Kesterson and Christina Priscilla
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Bluesky Diversified, Inc. doing business as Puente Hills Ford and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Norma Rubio et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2018cv04878
Plaintiff:
Norma Rubio, Christina Priscilla Kesterson and Christina Priscilla
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Ford Motor Company, Bluesky Diversified, Inc. doing business as Puente Hills Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Carissa Lozano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2018cv21301
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Ford Motor Company, Bluesky Diversified Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carissa Lozano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Carissa Lozano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-cv-01673
Plaintiff:
Carissa Lozano
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , Bluesky Diversified Inc. and Does
Yvonne Quintero et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-01912
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Bluesky Diversified, Inc. doing business as Puente Hills Ford
Yvonne Quintero et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01912
Defendant:
Bluesky Diversified, Inc., Ford Motor Company and Bluesky Diversified, Inc. doing business as Puente Hills Ford
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Quintero and Salvador Quintero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Carissa Lozano v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01673
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Bluesky Diversified Inc., Bluesky Diversified Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Puente Hills Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Carissa Lozano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
