Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Quhshi et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv02775
Plaintiff:
Yusra Dahan Quhshi and Turki Maresh Taher Hazaea
Defendant:
Director Ur Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Salomon v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Ronald Salomon
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Natalichvili v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 1:2019cv00456
Defendant:
Deputy Director Ronald D. Vitiello, Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Board of Immigration Appeals and others
Plaintiff:
Georgi Natalichvili
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker, Matthew G. Whitaker and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
New York Legal Assistance Group v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 1:2018cv09495
Defendant:
Executive Office For Immigration Review, Board of Immigration Appeals and U.S. Department Of Justice
Plaintiff:
New York Legal Assistance Group
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Singh v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 1:2015cv05541
Plaintiff:
Sukhwinder Singh
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 1:2015cv01269
Plaintiff:
Huai Zhou Chen
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Travon Rudradean v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 9:2014mc00053
Respondent:
Board of Immigration Appeals et al
Krivonos v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2011cv02729
Defendant:
Jennifer J. Barnes, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Boris A. Krivonos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
