Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07004
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02626
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fordjour v. Executive Office for Immigration Review Director et al
as 2:2009cv02806
Petitioner:
Charles A. Fordjour
Respondent:
Executive Office for Immigration Review Director, Board of Immigration Appeals, Board of Immigration Appeals Chairman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paco v. Holder et al
as 2:2009cv01906
Petitioner:
Ariel Eloy Paco
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dehuma v. Board of Immigration Appeals et al
as 3:2007cv06383
Plaintiff:
Juan Dehuma
Defendant:
Board of Immigration Appeals, Department of Justice, CDCR Officials and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jonathan Chibnall et al v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 2:2007cv05685
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Chibnall and Hazel May Deegan
Defendant:
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Christina Poulos, Executive Office for Immigration Board of Immigration Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
