Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Williams v. Bland et al
as 7:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Robert E. Hollomann, John LNU, Bobby Bland and others
Plaintiff:
Thurman O'Neil Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. City of Odessa, Texas et al
as 7:2017cv00256
Defendant:
Lawrence Barber, District Attorney Bobby Bland and Assistant, City of Odessa, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almond v. Bland et al
as 7:2017cv00194
Defendant:
J. Aguirre, Jr., Bobby Bland, Sgt. FNU Chadwick and others
Plaintiff:
Stefan Thomas Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Griffis et al
as 7:2017cv00131
Defendant:
Bobby Bland, Adrian Chavez, Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rocha v. Bland
as 7:2017cv00053
Defendant:
Bobby Bland
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Potter et al
as 7:2016cv00399
Defendant:
161st Court, 358th District Court, 70th District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Bland
as 7:2016cv00315
Respondent:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Petitioner:
Jimmy L. Headrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Bland
as 7:2016cv00124
Defendant:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia vs Bland
as 7:2016cv00126
Respondent:
R. N. (Bobby) Bland
Petitioner:
Rafael Leon Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
