Cases 1 - 10 of 52
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17800
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE KEEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2022cv25412
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE WHITE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, C PALEN, MAURICE D MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell et al v. Russell et al
as 1:2022cv23427
Plaintiff:
MOTHER Thomas Grant Neusom and VICTORIA CHRISTIAN RUSSELL
Defendant:
Baron Jefferson Russell, VICKY Q. SMITH, ROBERT RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lawrence v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Lawrence
Defendant:
Davis, M. Norman, R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11316
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANGLIN v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE ANGLIN
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. JAMISON
as 4:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cotton
Defendant:
BOBBY LEE JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
COTTON v. JAMISON
as 4:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cotton
Defendant:
Bobby Lee Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUMMERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55189
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE SUMMERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
