Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SMITH et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2017cv02596
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SMITH and BOBBIE SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUSTIN et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv04762
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR AUSTIN , CHARLES BURKES , ETHEL CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC , ARYAN KADIVAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv01744
Petitioner:
Bobby Smith
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AIKENS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05476
Plaintiff:
MAURICE AIKENS , FRANK BERNARDI , TONY BERTI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GARTH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv03889
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SMITH GARTH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH-GARTH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv06061
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SMITH-GARTH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85084
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SMITH, BOBBIE SMITH, WILLIE L. SMITH and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75609
Plaintiff:
BOBBY SMITH
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMITH v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2007cv04518
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE SMITH
Defendant:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
