Cases 101 - 110 of 2,105
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfaro v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Jose Alfaro
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Sayantan Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Sayantan (SY) Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Durrell Singleton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:24cv903. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:24cv899.
as 4:2024cv00903
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:24cv904. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:24cv899
as 4:2024cv00904
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00905
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00909
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
