Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Liu et al v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 1:2014cv13234
Plaintiff:
Li Liu and Dr. Emily Liu
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Marianne B. Bowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: State of Iowa Cases
as 1:2007cv12141
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, State of Iowa, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alpharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10879
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of Ohio v. Dey Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10270
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, State of Ohio, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Dey Inc., Dey Inc., Warrick Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv10248
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10158
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
