Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Brown et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Brown and Norman Brown
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Carmaleta Pruitt
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Carol S Russell and Isaac Russell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowery v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 3:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Melinda D Lowery
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoffner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Penny Shoffner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jean Allen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Sherry Hale and Howard Hale
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanifer v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
Crystal Michelle Stanifer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Wilder
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00228
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
