Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wisconsin Voters Alliance, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-5056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arizona Voter Integrity Alliance, John Wood, Georgia Voters Alliance and others
Interested Party:
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Defendant / Appellee:
Jake Corman, Senate majority Leader of Pennsylvania Senate, in his official capacity, Bryan Carter, Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, in his official capacity, Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin, in his official capacity and others
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Claire Morin v. University of Massachusetts, et al
as 16-7088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Claire Morin
Defendant - Appellee:
University of Massachusetts, "UMass", Board of Trustees, Chris Bowers, Mr. and others
American Wild Horse Preservati, et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 15-5332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign, Carla Bowers and Return to Freedom
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas L. Tidwell, Chief, U.S. Forest Service and Ann D. Carlson, Acting Supervisor, Modoc National Forest, U.S. Forest Service
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
California Cattlemen's Association, California Farm Bureau Federation, Public Lands Council and others
NLRB v. NTN-Bower Corporation
as 11-1205
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
NTN-Bower Corporation
NTN-Bower Corporation v. NLRB
as 11-1187
Petitioner:
NTN-Bower Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Anthony Roth v. DOJ
as 09-5428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony C. Roth, on behalf of Lester L. Bower, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
