Cases 1 - 10 of 30
BALDWIN et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01923
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BALDWIN, JAMES CAHALAN, BRUCE GINSBURG and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILLIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILLIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS et al v. BOWLES et al
as 2:2014cv02330
Plaintiff:
BRYON EVANS , SR. and GLORIA EVANS
Defendant:
IVORY BOWLES and McLANE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACKERMAN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
PAULA ACKERMAN , RUBY ADAMS , CARL AGNELLO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAUN v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2013cv03192
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LEE BRAUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING and GOLDEN BOWL RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRAUN v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2013cv02666
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LEE BRAUN
Defendant:
CITY OF READING and GOLDEN BOWL RESTAURANT OWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BOWLING v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
KELLY BOWLING
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOWLING et al v. HANSON et al
as 5:2012cv00521
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BOWLING and MARA SCHLICHTMANN BOWLING
Defendant:
GERHARDT HANSON, SUPERB TRUCKING COMPANY, LLC, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARISH et al v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2011cv07426
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. PARISH and SHANAKA BERRY
Defendant:
JOHN W. BOWLING and MOUNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv47875
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOWLES , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOWLES v. MOORE et al
as 2:2011cv02637
Defendant:
JOHN E. MOORE, CHRIS JONES and LATIA JONES
Plaintiff:
MARY K. BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
