Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ordonez v. Taylorsville City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sonia Ordonez
Defendant:
Taylorsville City Police Department, Scott Lloyd, Ethan Andrus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
McGill et al v. Intermountain Health Care
as 2:2020cv00790
Plaintiff:
Caitlin McGill, Nina McGill, Heather Aldridge and others
Defendant:
Intermountain Health Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Tooele County et al
as 2:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Brad Young, Wilbert Tso, Tooele County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. Tooele City Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Tooele City Police Department, Scott Schovaers, Brian White and others
Plaintiff:
Seven V. Wilson
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
