Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PATTERSON v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PATTERSON v. 360CONNECT, LLC
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
360Connect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grimmway Enterprises Inc v B & B Organics Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00261
Plaintiff:
Grimmway Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
B & B Organics Inc, Cynthia G Boynton and Brad B Boynton
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Pacific Coast Fruit Company, Heath & Lejeune, Inc., Calavo Growers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
SWALLERS v. SKAGGS, et al.
as 1:2016mc00007
Counter Defendant:
REBECCA BRELAGE, EDWARD GEORGE BURGE, DAVID CERTO and others
Federal District Case) (1:14-cv-1681-SEB-DKL:
COURT OF RECORD
49D09-1410-JM-00864) (49D09-1509-JC-002845:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE DIVISION
Counter Claimant:
A. S. and BRENT SWALLERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE MOTION TO MODIFY SUBPOENA
as 1:2015mc00090
Petitioner:
BFM TRANSPORTATION, LLC and BRAD F. MEYER
Respondent:
THOMAS GIOVENCO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KINETECH, LLC v. WILLIAMS & LAKE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00574
Defendant:
JAMES CONINE, BRAD DORSEY, LOREN LEMCKE and others
Plaintiff:
KINETECH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Walz v. Jones Huff & Jones
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brad Walz
Defendant:
Jones Huff & Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
