Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 222
Eric Russell v. Brad Cain
as 23-35210
Petitioner / Appellant: ERIC DESHAUNTE RUSSELL
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
Deschaine v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner: Norman Dean Deschaine
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Cain et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Petitioner: Daniel Turner
Respondent: Brad Cain and Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Salmon v. Brad Cain, et al
as 23-35137
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD W. SALMON
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution and OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Respondent: MARK NOOTH, OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE and ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, The Attorney General of the State
Cisneros v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00248
Petitioner: William Cisneros
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Underwood v. Brad Cain
as 23-35063
Petitioner / Appellant: DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Gutierrez v. Cain We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00088
Petitioner: Antonio A. Gutierrez
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00003
Petitioner: Robert Earl Mayo
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bourne Huddleston v. Brad Cain
as 22-36012
Petitioner / Appellant: BOURNE HUDDLESTON
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Snake River Correctional Institution Superintendent
Craig Swinney v. Brad Cain
as 22-35979
Petitioner / Appellant: CRAIG ALAN SWINNEY
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?