Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Barroso v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston and Wren Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawka v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Frank Joseph Sawka
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Maria E Ramirez, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Livingston et al
as 4:2021cv02728
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Ezell
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quarteman, Gary Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Collier et al
as 4:2021cv02536
Plaintiff:
Devin Simmons
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Lorie Davis, Deputy Fnu Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Parker et al
as 4:2021cv01980
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Steve Vic Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Director TDCJ-CID, R Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. State of Texas - TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv02889
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Respondent:
State of Texas - TDCJ and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drones v. State of Texas Courts et al
as 4:2019cv00248
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, State of Texas Courts, Employees and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hood v. Livingston et al
as 3:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Mark Robert, M.D. Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dale Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
