Cases 1 - 10 of 306
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01747
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01637
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Kevin Dehart, Jennifer Lewman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01278
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradford v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Radley Bradford
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bradford v. Zeelool, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Bradford
Defendant:
Zeelool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gordon et al v. Traders Domain FX, LTD et al
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Virgil Gordon, Laquan Taylor, Bradford Giles and others
Defendant:
Traders Domain FX, LTD, Veritex Community Bank, Secap Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Wingham v. Shamie
as 4:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bradford Wingham
Defendant:
Jusufu M Shamie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
