Cases 1 - 7 of 7
American Transit Insurance Company v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
American Transit Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bradley Pierre, Marvin Moy, M.D., Rutland Medical P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Pierre et al
as 1:2023cv06572
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Bradley Pierre, Medical Reimbursement Consultants Inc., Marvin Moy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United Services Automobile Association et al v. Rutland Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2018cv04727
Plaintiff:
USAA General Indemnity Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, United Services Automobile Association and others
Defendant:
Rutland Medical, P.C., Marvin Moy, M.D., Medical Reimbursement Consultants Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
L.D. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00637
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Bradley Pierre, Jane Valentine and others
Plaintiff:
L.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Insurance Corporation et al v. Mohuchy, D.S. et al
as 1:2014cv02168
Defendant:
ABC Corporations 1 through 20, Acupuncture Works, P.C., BH400 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
American States Insurance Company, LM General Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daniel et al v. Doe 1-10 et al
as 1:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
Diedre Daniel
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, The City of New York , The Administration For Childrens' Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Eclesiaste Pierre
as 13-12859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ECLESIASTE PIERRE, a.k.a. Eclesiaste Bradley Pierre, a.k.a. Eclesiaste B. Pierre, a.k.a. Pierre Eclesiase E. Saintoleme, a.k.a. Eclesiase E. Saintoleme Pierre
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
