Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Lannett Company, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08147
Plaintiff:
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. v. GATOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01975
Plaintiff:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
GATOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and KVK-TECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Gator Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00389
Plaintiff:
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Gator Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and KVK-Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Cypress Pharmaceutical, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06851
Plaintiff:
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant:
Cypress Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. v. PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC.
as 3:2011cv04568
Plaintiff:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ROCHESTER CRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. et al v. BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
as 3:2011cv01524
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. , LOUISIANA DRUG WHOLESALE CO., INC. , MEIJER INC. and others
Respondent:
KREMERS URBAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. v. AMRUTHAM, INC.
as 2:2011cv01854
Plaintiff:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
AMRUTHAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC. v. NOVEL LABORATORIES, INC.
as 3:2011cv01341
Plaintiff:
BRAINTREE LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
NOVEL LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
