Cases 71 - 80 of 104
CALLIER v. SUMMIT HORIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CALLIER
Defendant:
SUMMIT HORIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC and MORRIS LOBE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Callier v. The Design Laza, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
The Design Laza, Inc and Ali Khan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. Nest Egg Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Nest Egg Financial, LLC, Landmark Legal LLC and Jonathan Wilsman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. Indymae, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Indymae, LLC, William O'Donnell and Greenwich Business Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. Morality Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Morality Inc., Joshua Cacho, Veritas Legal Plan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. Charter Communications, Inc
as 3:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc doing business as Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. United Docu Prep, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
United Docu Prep, Inc. and Saqib Khan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. EBF Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
EBF PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a EVEREST BUSINESS FUNDING, Scott Crockett and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Callier v. Infusion Capital Group. LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Infusion Capital Group. LLC, Drew Matthew Hagerman and Michael Brincat
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
