Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09334
Plaintiff:
IRVIN BRAZIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY BRAZIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08679
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BRAZIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02617
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BRAZIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAZILL v. JONES et al
as 5:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
GLENN E HANCOCK, CAROL PITTMAN, MARK S INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11883
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BRAZIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZILE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12381
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BRAZILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAZIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97423
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J BRAZIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
