Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Quinn v. Tritt et al
as 3:2018cv00632
Plaintiff:
Phillip Quinn
Defendant:
Brenda L. Tritt , Kathy Brittain , Joseph Sankus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOBLEY v. TRITT et al
as 2:2016cv00761
Petitioner:
PETER MOBLEY
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDOLPH v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05867
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL ROBERT RANDOLPH
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. Tritt et al
as 4:2015cv02041
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Robert Randolph
Respondent:
Brenda L. Tritt and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv03417
Petitioner:
SHAVARYEA TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Tritt et al
as 3:2015cv01178
Petitioner:
Shavaryea Taylor
Respondent:
Brenda L. Tritt and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mable v. Tritt et al
as 3:2015cv01138
Petitioner:
Steven J Mable
Respondent:
Brenda L Tritt and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILSON v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv01455
Petitioner:
LARRY WILSON
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mutschler v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2015cv00472
Petitioner:
Tony L. Mutschler
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA, Brenda L. Tritt and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv00425
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALLEN
Respondent:
BRENDA L. TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
