Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Elizondo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01084
Defendant: Teva Women's Health LLC doing business as TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, The Cooper Companies Inc and others
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Elizondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04553
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00923
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Underwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00276
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Underwood
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv04087
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Reid
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lockett v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Lockett
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Greene v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff: Brenda Lee Greene
Defendant: Ruby Tuesday, Inc. and Kimberly S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02871
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mi00378
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?