Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Partlow v Chambers
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heath D. Partlow
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemery v. Chambers
as 1:2023cv02764
Petitioner:
Steven Lemery
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Petitioner:
Willie Clarence Lee, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Antione Caldwell, Kevin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynn v. Caldwell
as 3:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
James Lynn
Respondent:
Antoine G. Caldwell and Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Chambers et al
as 1:2021cv03843
Petitioner:
DARRYL BEARNARD CURRY
Respondent:
Unit Manager Brian Chambers and DeShawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CURRY v. CHAMBERS et al
as 4:2021cv00161
Petitioner:
DARRYL BEARNARD CURRY
Respondent:
Warden BRIAN CHAMBERS and WARDEN DESHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alford v. Chambers
as 3:2021cv00151
Petitioner:
Richard Deon Alford
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
