Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Scott v. Curran et al
as 3:2026cv03111
Plaintiff:
Monte Scott
Defendant:
Brian Curran and . Halkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Kettlekamp et al
as 3:2026cv03097
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks
Defendant:
Bruce Kettlekamp, Christian County, Cecil Polley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Curran et al
as 3:2026cv03086
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Thompson
Defendant:
Brian Curran and Anthony Grootens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milsap v. Grootens et al
as 3:2026cv03051
Plaintiff:
Wayne Milsap
Defendant:
Tony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deanna Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Hendricks v. Brian Curran, et al
as 25-2763
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS
Defendant:
BRIAN CURRAN, HEATHER LEINDECKER, KYLIE JONES and others
Snow v. Curran et al
as 3:2024cv03181
Defendant:
Deana Coleman, Brian Curran and Heather Leindecker
Plaintiff:
Justin Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03170
Defendant:
Deana Coleman, Anthony Grootens and Brian Curran
Plaintiff:
Shilow Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03172
Defendant:
Brian Curran, Anthony Grootens, Deana Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks et al v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03163
Defendant:
Robert Reich, Mark Dietrich, Tim Finley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks and Justin Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Kettelkamp et al
as 3:2024cv03138
Defendant:
Adams County Board Members, Christian County Board Members, Bruce Kettelkamp and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
