Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Earl v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv01324
Petitioner:
Melvin L. Earl
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meades v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv01275
Petitioner:
Robert R. Meades
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talley v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv01176
Plaintiff:
Derek J Talley
Defendant:
Warden Brian Emig, Lt. Casey Phelps, Chris Senato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Howard et al
as 1:2026cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Sgt. William Howard, LT Audrey Evans, LT. Heather Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. EMIG et al
as 3:2026cv11974
Plaintiff:
ERIN JAYMAR FORD
Defendant:
BRIAN EMIG, ROBERT MAY, ERIN NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff v. Weston et al
as 1:2026cv01069
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. McGriff
Defendant:
Lakwann Weston, K. Marsh, D. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Emig, et al.
as 1:2026cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Warden Brian Emig, Delaware Department of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv01047
Plaintiff:
William P. Henderson
Defendant:
Warden Brian Emig, Deputy Warden Jonathan Beck, Lt. Keshaw Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perrigan v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv00966
Plaintiff:
Da'Shan Perrigan
Defendant:
Brian Emig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jewell v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv00931
Plaintiff:
David Jewell
Defendant:
Brian Emig, Jonathan Beck, Michael Jastrob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
