Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lockard v. Brian Locke Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03257
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lockard
Defendant:
Brian Locke Trucking, Inc., Kenneth Kruesel and Kenneth Kreusel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Locke et al v. Wilson et al
as 6:2020cv01049
Plaintiff:
SERGIO SEPE and BRIAN LOCKE
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and DARNELL DANTE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOCKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66433
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOCKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv16587
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-10280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker et al v. Cache County Utah et al
as 1:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Tucker , Jesus Cabrera , Barry Snyder and others
Defendant:
Cache County Utah , G. Lynn Nelson , Brian Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lock et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv11730
Plaintiff:
Deidre Lock and Brian Lock
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanchard v. Whistle et al
as 5:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Devon Addison Blanchard
Defendant:
John Whistle, Kyle Moore, Larry Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Cache County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Griffin
Defendant:
Cache County Jail, G. Lynn Nelson, Kim Cheshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
