Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jairus Moore v. Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al
as 21-13792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAIRUS BERNARD MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAIRMAN, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, VICE CHAIRMAN, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, BRIAN OWENS, State Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent:
THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Richmond v. US
as 21-2012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOBBY MARBURGER, KIMBERLY BUSH, JAMES KIRKLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 21-11400
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, DELOACH, FNU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Richmond v. US
as 21-125
Respondent:
CARL WARNER, JOSEPH AUGUSTA, CHARLES PINNIZZOTTO and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Quincey Smith v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-11632
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, BRAXTON T. COTTON, Vice Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCEY SMITH
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 7:2019cv00191
Defendant:
RICK JACOBS, BRIAN OWENS and TERRY E BERNARD
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES J HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jackie Roller v. James Mills, et al
as 19-13091
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAXTON COTTON, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, TERRY BARNARD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKIE RAY ROLLER
Mandriez Spivey v. Brian Owens, et al
as 19-11584
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTORIA MALONE, BRIAN OWENS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Mitchell Ludy v. James Mills, et al
as 19-10152
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY E. BARNARD, Chairman of Board of Pardons and Paroles, BRIAN OWENS, JACQUELINE BUNN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL LUDY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
