Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Valdiviez et al v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Javier Valdiviez and Luz Higina Ruelas Corral
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Ford Motor Company and Robert B. Gibson Auto Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC
as 1:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC and Bridgestone Firestone North American Tires, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Gregory v. Harris et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ashli Gregory
Defendant:
Dorrell Harris, Skyway Logistics Corp. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Long v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC et al.
as 2:2013cv00965
Plaintiff:
Casey Long
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC and Cecilia Dodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cota et al v. Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00766
Defendant:
Bridgestone Firestone, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC, Ford Motor Company and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Cota, Veronica Cota, Rosa Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robison vs. Ford Motor Co., et al
as 1:2007cv00762
Plaintiff:
John Robison, John Robison and John Robison
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.